Content Mapping
Case-Study Consolidation Into the Right Service Hubs
A typed mapping that assigns each case study to exactly one service hub with no duplicates, so case studies render under the service they prove — enforced by a test, not by manual sorting.
HMX Zone
Typed selectors
Verified HMX-owned case
Outcome signals
These are the real outcome statements attached to this HMX case study.
- One home
- each study maps to a single service
- No dupes
- test blocks the same study appearing twice
- Relevant
- service pages show proof that matches
- Covered
- every study is accounted for in CI
Case architecture
Case-Study Consolidation Into the Architecture
6 nodes
a record mapping every
Expose a selector that
TypeScript SSOT mapping
Typed selectors
Fallback Path
One home each study maps to
- 01a record mapping every
A typed mapping that assigns each case study to exactly one service hub with no duplicates, so case studies render under the service they prove — e...
- 02Expose a selector that
Expose a selector that returns the studies for a given service
- 03TypeScript SSOT mapping
TypeScript SSOT mapping (lib/service-data.ts) supports the route, form, or data boundary for Case-Study Consolidation Into the so public UX and backend state stay connected.
- 04Typed selectors
Render each hub's case-study list from that selector, removing filler generators
- 05Fallback Path
When automation confidence is low, route the record to a manual owner with the source, stage, and last action attached.
- 06One home each study maps to
One home each study maps to a single service; No dupes test blocks the same study appearing twice; Relevant service pages show proof that matches;...
Problem
The operating gap
Case studies sit in a flat pile disconnected from the services they demonstrate. The same study gets copy-pasted under multiple services, counts drift, and visitors on a service page see generic filler instead of relevant proof.
Build
What gets built
Build a single source-of-truth map from each case-study id to one primary service, then power every service hub's case-study list from that selector. A mapping test enforces one-service-each with no duplicates and full coverage, so the relationship stays correct as studies are added.
Build steps
Case-Study Consolidation Into the Right Service Hubs uses a web app route, data, and conversion layer for Full-Stack Websites. A typed mapping that assigns each case study to exactly one service hub with no duplicates, so case studies render under the service they prove — e... The architecture connects a record mapping every, typescript ssot mapping, typed selectors, and one home each study maps to with an explicit control path.
- 01Define a record mapping every case-study id to exactly one service slug
- 02Expose a selector that returns the studies for a given service
- 03Render each hub's case-study list from that selector, removing filler generators
- 04Write a test asserting one-service-each, no duplicates, and total coverage
- 05Strip duplicated copy so each study lives in one canonical place
- 06Wire the mapping test into the verify gate to lock the relationship
Stack
Tools and layers
- TypeScript SSOT mapping (lib/service-data.ts)
- Typed selectors
- Next.js dynamic service routes
- Jest-style mapping test (tsx)
- Vercel
- Experience layer: Define a record mapping every case-study id to exactly one service slug
- Server layer: Expose a selector that returns the studies for a given service
- Database layer: TypeScript SSOT mapping (lib/service-data.ts) supports the route, form, or data boundary for Case-Study Consolidation Into the so public UX and backend state stay connected.
- Automation layer: Typed selectors handles routine steps while build a single source-of-truth map from each case-study id to one primary service, then power every service hub's case-study list from that selector.
- Measurement layer: One home each study maps to a single service; No dupes test blocks the same study appearing twice; Relevant service pages show proof that matches;...
Data flow
- 01Define a record mapping every case-study id to exactly one service slug
- 02Expose a selector that returns the studies for a given service
- 03Render each hub's case-study list from that selector, removing filler generators
- 04Write a test asserting one-service-each, no duplicates, and total coverage
- 05Strip duplicated copy so each study lives in one canonical place
- 06Wire the mapping test into the verify gate to lock the relationship
Controls
- Case studies sit in a flat pile disconnected from the services they demonstrate.
- Build a single source-of-truth map from each case-study id to one primary service, then power every service hub's case-study list from that selector.
- When automation confidence is low, route the record to a manual owner with the source, stage, and last action attached.
Research basis
A route assembles through form, data, metadata, and deploy checks.
The same website operating path
Full-stack websites for service businesses and operators: route architecture, service pages, lead capture, metadata, proof boundaries, blog/database paths, analytics, and deployment checks.
Route map
Service architecture
Clear service routes
01active
Progress72%
Lead capture
Form and context flow
Lead capture that saves context
02active
Progress86%
Public metadata
SEO and schema layer
SEO and schema on public pages
03active
Progress64%
Launch QA
Analytics and deployment checks
Analytics events tied to CTAs
04active
Progress91%